Can business activity be classified as a foreign tax establishment in Poland?
Does working remotely in IT create a foreign tax establishment? Could operating from Poland temporarily lead to tax consequences for sole proprietorships? These are the key questions explored in our latest analysis. In a recent article in Gazeta Wyborcza, our experts shared their insights on this topic.
Recently, more updates on tax audits have emerged. How long can they last? What should businesses be cautious about during verification processes? Does a completed audit guarantee safety for the taxpayer? A recent article in Rzeczpospolita features commentary by Piotr Sekulski PhD, shedding light on these questions.
Tax authorities are increasingly monitoring online sellers. This raises questions about how to correctly report taxation of online sales. How will the DAC7 directive impact sellers’ PIT filings? Recently, Rzeczpospolita published an article featuring commentary from Piotr Sekulski, PhD on this subject.
Recently, tax authorities have been increasingly thorough in examining the right to apply the IP Box tax relief. What exactly does an IP Box audit involve? Should you be concerned about tax inspections? Is there a risk that you won’t receive the refund from this relief? Recently, an article containing a comment by Piotr Sekulski, PhD on this topic was published in Prawo.pl.
An error in CEIDG can have drastic consequences for entrepreneurs changing their form of taxation. What should you do if your notification of the change in the form of taxation doesn’t reach the tax office? What if the application submitted through CEIDG wasn’t processed? Are you at risk of paying PIT according to the progressive scale?
More and more often, Director of the National Tax Information (KIS) refuses to issue individual interpretations. The basis for such decisions is the justified suspicion that the activity described by the taxpayer may be considered as tax avoidance (i.e., Article 119a § 1 of the Tax Ordinance). Recently, such decisions have been issued particularly frequently in case of the provision of services (B2B) to a company by a member of its management board. The tax authorities’ change in approach is particularly noticeable in the case of entrepreneurs applying for an interpretation regarding the appropriate lump-sum rate.
Employees relatively often face the issue of switching from an employment agreement to a B2B contract. Let’s consider the income tax consequences of establishing B2B cooperation with the former employer (or current).
[Shareholder invoices his company] Providing services by a board member or a shareholder to a company under a B2B agreement is a hot topic due to the recent change in the tax authority’s approach to qualifying such agreements. Tax authorities have recently taken the stance that this way of forming cooperation may be considered artificial due to the extraction of certain services from the company’s scope of activity and their transfer to the taxpayer’s business activity.
Taxes in IT are often a complicated and complex issue, especially at the beginning of the year. Together with Agnieszka Myśliwczyk, we decided to shed some light on the issue of lump sum rates, the choice of form of taxation, leasings and those topics that affect you on a daily basis. We invite you to watch/listen to our conversation!
Does a person running an FOP who escaped from Ukraine as a result of hostilities have to pay additional tax in Poland? Is a foreign tax establishment an issue in the case of IT specialists? Do operating FOP from Polish territory for a short period of time result in tax consequences for JDG? Our experts’ commentary on this issue was published in the latest article on Prawo.pl.
IT Managers – Lump Sum Tax Rate of 8.5%, 12%, or 15%? 11 July 2024
Lump sum and online advertisements revenue 11 July 2024
Can I apply the 50% tax deductible costs? 11 July 2024
Providing Services to a Company by a Board Member – is it Tax Optimization? 11 July 2024
Settlement of a low-value mandate contract 6 May 2024
